tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-49720163991963107072024-03-19T03:51:31.210+00:00think/rantthink/rant is a podcast where some liberals discuss the week's news, with a slant towards science, philosophy, religion and morality. May contain some humour.John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.comBlogger76125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-75272320344049994612013-05-10T11:45:00.003+01:002013-05-10T11:46:23.934+01:00Skeptics In The Cardiff Central Library<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As with many twitter based stories, very quickly misunderstandings, assumptions and speculation can create a storm in a tea-cup. That's not to say that there is nothing to the story of how Cardiff Skeptics had their request to hold two events turned down. As the person involved in correspondence with the library over the matter, I thought it best to set out some of the facts.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On April 10th Cardiff Skeptics received a request via email to help curate an <a href="http://www.thesprout.co.uk/en/events/jon-ronson-ctral-library/07113.html">evening event at Cardiff Central Library</a>. The event takes place on Friday 24th May, starting at 7 and finishing at 9. I myself was not available, but I got in touch with fellow skeptic Dean Burnett who was happy to help out. The event features Jon Ronson doing a talk before a Q&A session and then some book signing. This is pretty much the same start time and format as any Cardiff SITP event.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The library staff member who contacted me (we'll refer to him as Jason) also made it clear that the library, although disimilar to our usual venue (no alcohol), would be happy to help out with future events if we were interested.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This was serndipitous as I had two big names booked for June and July and needed a larger venue to cater for the resulting greater attendance.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Jason told me that if events are free then the library would be happy to host it, but paid ticketed events may be an option. During the daytime they could host 60 people but could accomodate up to 100 after hours.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I told Jason that SITP events aren't free as we need to be able to cover speakers' expenses such as travel, food and sometimes hotel. I then revealed that the two speakers we had booked were John Sweeney and Prof David Nutt.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On April 18th Jason replied, saing that if we ticketed the event and included a £1 charge on each ticket which went to the library then it should be fine. He mentioned that Cardiff libraries may be concerned about the controversial nature of the talks and that if we were still interested he would find out if there was an issue.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I followed up confirming we were still interested and confirmed the nature of the talks.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On April 21st Jason replied to inform me that he'd spoken to the library manager and that they'd in turn be speaking to the management team the following Monday.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Noticing that a publicly owned venue may potentially be blocking us due to the nature of the talks I politely enquired about guidelines about who can and can't use the venue.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Jason replied, citing Cardiff Council's equalities plan, Everybody Matters. Anything that went against its equalities plan would be a no no (therefore no EDL etc).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On May 7th I sent another email to Jason, asking if a decision had been made.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The next day I received a reply saying that Jason had spoken to the library's manager and that they "wouldn't be able to do them". No explanation was given.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I instantly resigned myself to having to find another venue, not particularly bothered by what I considered simple bureacracy. It was only once I got round to thinking about the context of the refusal that I indulged in two throw-away tweets saying how disappointed I was that the library refused us in te context of controversial speakers and an inclusivity policy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I expected a few retweets and comments, but I didn't expect to be contacted by the press. The genie was now out of the bottle. Peter Law, journalist for Wales Online and the South Wales Echo contacted me and I gave a short telephone interview. He was also sent a copy of the email exchange with the library for him to verify. He also got in contact with John Sweeney for a quote. His <a href="http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/panorama-journalist-former-uk-drugs-3566713">article on the Wales Online website</a> did a good job of summing up the situation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At the end of yesterday the council offered the following statement:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"We would like to make it clear that Cardiff Council has not refused to allow Cardiff Skeptics in the Pub to hold their event at the library as a result of the nature of the topics to be discussed. Unfortunately in this instance the staff member has given incorrect advice to the organisers as despite the fact that Central Library does hold in-house evening events it is not set up as a night time venue, as there are budget implications in terms of staff costs. On this occasion the library is unable to host the event due to staffing issues. Since there has been a misunderstanding we will work with the organisers to find a suitable venue for their June meeting. And as with all requests, the manager of Central Library is happy to talk directly to the organisers about their proposals and explore the library’s suitability for any events in the future."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So Cardiff Council deny the talks were blocked because of their content. They cite staffing issues as the reason. This all seems very plausible, as many have pointed out. However, it does not address all issues in the correspondence between myself and Jason. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There is a slight contradiction if we consider Cardiff Council's statement in the context of Jason's emails. Cardiff Council state that the venue is not set up for evening events, even though they admit that they do host evening events (Jon Ronson?)and one of their staff members has openly offered to host evening events. The implication is that Jason was operating outside of his remit.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Adding insult to injury, the library hosted an "Evening of Mediumship" in Janruary. There may be a real problem of staffing on June 17th for our event, but it is over a month away and it is strange that they are so certain that they will not able to make any arrangements by then. Any reference to budgeting is also bizarre as Cardiff Skeptics were happy to ticket the event, raising revenue for the library. If the library really needed certain costs to be paid then why not ask us to pay the hire charge?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
They also don't address Jason's expressed concerns about management's apparent concern over controversial talks. Is it suggesting that management actually have no such concerns and Jason's were unfounded?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At the end of it all, the council seem to want to put it all down to miscommunication and shift the blame on to the staff on the shop floor. I am no conspiracy theorist, so I do not doubt the council's statement simply because it's an official statement. But I do not think it goes far enough to address all of the issues and I remain skeptical on all sides.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If there is an audit trail surrounding the decision to not host the event then perhaps a FoI request may help us uncover additional facts that may give us a bit more certainty. I will therefore be drafting a request over the weekend and submitting it first thing on Monday.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the meantime, Cardiff Skeptics welcome Cardiff Council's offer to help us find an alternative venue and look forward to a positive relationship with them in the future.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
John Stabler, Organiser of Cardiff Skeptics in the Pub</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
UPDATE: An updated version of the story was feature on page 3 of the South Wales Echo and is also on the <a href="http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/cardiff-council-blames-misunderstanding-after-3567620">Wales Online website</a>.</div>
John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-45267594762011949962012-08-14T14:45:00.000+01:002012-08-14T14:45:11.118+01:00The Death Penalty as a Cost Saver<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Over the years I have spoken to
many people online about the death penalty. Luckily, most of them are in
agreement with me and think that it's a bad idea. A few will agree that it's
not a great idea, but are sometimes swayed by emotion; for example, if a particularly
heinous crime is committed or they’re personally affected. Then there are those
who are so in favour of the death penalty that they actively seek to defend
their position with what I call Murder Apologetics.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
The one reason in particular I
wanted to talk about is the so called "cost saver". There are
actually people who think that a good reason to kill people is saving the tax
payer money. I am hoping to show that this is not only illogical, but that if
we take the logical argument to its conclusion, we get situations that are
morally repulsive.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
When faced with the cost saver
argument I always like to point out that killing people to save money is an
absolutely disgusting proposition and I am not happy that the many old and
infirm individuals who could be considered a burden on the state should be deemed
expendable. Of course, the apologist is quick to say that they do not believe
old people should be killed, just the criminals.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Next I ask them why criminals
deserve to be killed because they are a burden on the state and yet old people
who are a burden on the state do not? What is the difference between the two
groups? I am then treated to a text-book example of circular reasoning.
Apparently criminals deserve to be executed because they have committed a
crime. However, the apologist is only telling me what the definition of a
criminal is. I know what the definition of a criminal is, what I am asking is
why criminals THEREFORE deserve to die. They can phrase it in different ways;
for example, if they are talking about murderers they may say "because
they took a life", but the logical fallacy is just the same. What most
people don't realise is that criminals being deserving of punishment is a non
sequitur. There is no way to argue from one fact to another.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
You'll be surprised how many
people can't explain to me why people who commit crimes deserve to be punished.
They've been taught it from a young age. It has been drilled in to them. But
nobody can rationally explain why they think it is the case. The only thing
they can do is offer it as an opinion or say “just because”. Well, I don't know
about you, but I don't think we should be deciding whether people should live
or die simply because of a majority preference.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Once you understand this simple
truth, your view of the justice system changes somewhat. You don’t suddenly believe
we should stop punishing people or that the doors to the prisons should be
opened. But you do start to understand that there are legitimate, utilitarian
reasons for punishment such as deterrence and rehabilitation. However, saving
the tax payer money is not one of them, unless you want to support the murder
of the elderly too.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-34977446796641862672012-07-11T08:22:00.000+01:002012-07-11T09:23:53.618+01:00An Ode To Rhys<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Last night's Cardiff Skeptics In The Pub event was awesome, as is usually the case. I wrote a little poem to serve as an introduction to his talk and I wanted to share it with online friends who couldn't make it to the event. Obviously humour takes priority over absolute fact, but I think it sums up my experience of Rhys pretty well. I'm not sure the content is suitable on the 21st Floor, so I'll play it safe and post it here. Enjoy!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I arrived early at the Promised Land,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
and greeted Alice and Dean with glee,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I think they thought me sexually deviant,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Alice excused herself for a hasty wee.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I then met all of the regulars,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
and in the corner, Jimmy Crankie himself,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I thought he was the local eunuch,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
but it turns out he was a skeptical elf.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
No, he wasn't really an elf,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
or a halfling, hobbit or some other un-PC reference to a dwarf,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
it was the one and only Rhys Morgan,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
the purveyor of suits that are morph.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Now Rhys had been a bit poorly,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
and he asked some people on the 'net what to do,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
but when they recommended drinking bleach,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
he knew they were talking out the wazoo.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
He told them they were crazy,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
and there were no studies to support their claims,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
but when people got mad and feelings hurt,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
it was him who got the blames.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
So, he phoned the Trading Standards,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
the BBC got involved, that was a shock!</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
before he knew it he was famous,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
and all the girls wanted his – autograph.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Then our teenage hero was a critic,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
of a bogus treatment, as most would agree,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
some muppets in Houston have spent decades on it,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
and the trial has only got to stage three.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
His comments risked a libel suit,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
when he took on the infamous Doctor Burzynski,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
who sells terminal patients piss in a bottle,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
and who's therapy can best be described as risky.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Rhys has also got into trouble,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
with peers and school authorities,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
for publishing a picture a Jesus and Mo,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
that offended some religious minorities.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
But, I don't want to paint a bad picture,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
of Rhys as hell-raiser skeptic in a pub,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
he's also founder, and talented writer,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
of a blog called the Heresy Club.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Now, I don't want tell his story for him,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
even though it may employ razor-sharp wit,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I'll let him do that himself,</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
and stop making myself look like a tit.</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-153536462260088412012-07-03T11:00:00.000+01:002012-07-03T22:37:13.026+01:00Confirmation!In my <a href="http://thinkrant.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/finally-there-is-action.html">last post</a> I detailed how the IAIM have finally taken down the dodgy claims they made about the benefits of baby massage. Fulfilling my prophesy this arrived a couple of days later:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhA1sc6gM8MGiPGU0OZAgqsKvL7Zwp71k8nEavOfA7yXlvvuuAKIOrczLQ8PHFvwZaVBdoieyfyHryshvgBskX30w8DVdK_Y2stVUxHl0jE4S0RFqAdF60ARxcJe7-jS9YXQTOXFi37rChy/s1600/ASA+Letter+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhA1sc6gM8MGiPGU0OZAgqsKvL7Zwp71k8nEavOfA7yXlvvuuAKIOrczLQ8PHFvwZaVBdoieyfyHryshvgBskX30w8DVdK_Y2stVUxHl0jE4S0RFqAdF60ARxcJe7-jS9YXQTOXFi37rChy/s320/ASA+Letter+2.jpg" width="214" /></a></div>
<br />
So, we have a result! As I said in the previous post, however, my work is not quite done. I now have quite a number of instructors' websites with equally dubious claims on them. At least I now have something to quote in my correspondence with them. If there is a way for me to get action on misleading and unsubstantiated claims without having to trouble an over-burdened ASA then I still believe it is worth my time.<br />
<br />
I'd like to thank the few people who've supported my efforts and taken the time to show an interest in the practical application of skepticism.John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-22560213394751405552012-06-26T21:08:00.004+01:002012-06-26T21:09:38.112+01:00Episode 69 - No Subtitle Required!<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLJvL67lKsd9WyWxHB3QO3urOtg3Ms2xZSkuivSipOcT05JklDD3V6ENnn9ZpHcNYaDzxceEg6WpJraBEfcTJ7pRMhEwhDRVh2_MpvliIk6IamhgAVbTyIrOe69F96FI-mrIzPQ3cCxjKt/s1600/pig-69.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLJvL67lKsd9WyWxHB3QO3urOtg3Ms2xZSkuivSipOcT05JklDD3V6ENnn9ZpHcNYaDzxceEg6WpJraBEfcTJ7pRMhEwhDRVh2_MpvliIk6IamhgAVbTyIrOe69F96FI-mrIzPQ3cCxjKt/s1600/pig-69.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
More relaxed podcasting and editing means you get this a little late. However, it's still definitely worth a listen! Go <a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant69.mp3">download it now</a>.<br />
<br />
We talked about the drug dealer who wanted more jail time, the Tories' solution to child poverty, Indian Skeptic facing arrest, Hooters, Jeremy Hunt, Julian Assange, David Cameron's poor parenting skills, John Sentamu's homophobic rantings, gay marriage, the Daily Mail's "hot" technology news and Trevor sends in some super secret bonus material to keep you happy.John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-41113113820770137842012-06-18T08:30:00.000+01:002012-06-18T12:55:36.236+01:00Finally There Is Action<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Last night I thought I'd go and check the <a href="http://iaim.org.uk/">IAIM UK</a> website to see if they'd updated their list of benefits of infant (baby) massage and lo and behold they've removed the two claims I highlighted in my <a href="http://thinkrant.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/just-to-keep-people-up-do-date-with-my.html">complaint</a> to the <a href="http://www.asa.org.uk/">ASA</a>! I assume that I will soon be receiving correspondence from the ASA telling me that the case is now closed. However, I can tell you now that my work here is not finished and I'll explain why shortly.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It's a shame that the IAIM had to be referred to the ASA rather than taking seriously very genuine concerns over the scientific validity of their claims. Their behaviour highlights a very real and concerning problem: many people and organisations neglect their duty to be truthful in their dealings with others. Unless there is a legal requirement, many are more than happy to make unfounded, misleading or even flat out wrong claims as long as they're supported by anecdote, loose or faulty interpretation of clinical data, cherry-picking of data or studies, or "intuition".</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There are a great number of professional bodies and organisations who do much valuable work. Very often, however, we see an insulated culture where misinformation spreads within the "echo chamber". What sets the good, science-based organisations from the chaff is engagement with critics and action when problems are identified. In this case my legitimate concerns were<a href="http://thinkrant.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/follow-up-keeping-baby-massage-honest.html"> eventually acknowledged but the seriousness and urgency of them were not</a>; truth appeared to be of low priority. If professional organisations are not willing to act then they join the ranks of quacks and charlatans such as homeopaths and reiki healers who are happy to cash in on their denial of reality.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
What also irks me is that only the bare minimum has been done. The <a href="http://thinkrant.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/keeping-baby-massage-honest.html">two claims</a> in my complaint were the most grevious and were easily shown to be unsupported and misleading. However, I still believe there to be scope for the IAIM to do more to support the remaining claims (or remove if required), although I doubt they will so, or impress upon its members to do the same. This isn't evidence of an attitude change.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
My attention will now turn to the claim that massage can help "boost" the immune system, which I have seen on several massage instructors' websites. Although I do not have an adjudication against the IAIM to use in any correspondence with these people, I'll be highlighting the fact that the ASA has shown an interest in the industry, the types of claims being made and the fact that the IAIM has had to withdraw some of them.</div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-6697185061274596212012-06-14T08:00:00.000+01:002012-07-03T22:40:15.942+01:00IAIM ASA Complaint Update<div style="text-align: justify;">
Just to keep people up do date with my compaint against the ASA, here's a letter I received in the post yesterday. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMc3HNoL99_30T3cXxfRvYnN_pAqJxoaD1M8-3rtkP-WirnsckGOLKQ7OmuaVcerJq0kKrp554GXfn1iPd9nnHUq-UkHmTTU8e9Hez-qjvrtcXzlhWFRonNOXH8lyxns-E3YOYeEn6yhah/s1600/ASA+Complaint.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMc3HNoL99_30T3cXxfRvYnN_pAqJxoaD1M8-3rtkP-WirnsckGOLKQ7OmuaVcerJq0kKrp554GXfn1iPd9nnHUq-UkHmTTU8e9Hez-qjvrtcXzlhWFRonNOXH8lyxns-E3YOYeEn6yhah/s320/ASA+Complaint.jpg" width="221" /></a></div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I don't think it really shows much progress beyond my last update, but it does confirm that they'll be asking the IAIM for evidence to support their claims and then it will be looked at. Obviously the IAIM could simply remove the unsupported claims from their website and then the complaint would be resolved. However, I get the feeling that whatever the outcome, I'll be submitting many more complaints about unsupported or misleading claims on the websites of individual massage instructors. If the IAIM is unable to grasp the importance of this issue in regards to their own website then I'm not sure they can be relied upon to inform and regulate their memebers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If it gets to the point that I need to comment on any recommendation to the ASA Council then I may be looking for a little help in formulating a robust response.</div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-58525587359745956132012-06-11T21:17:00.004+01:002012-06-11T21:21:45.159+01:00Episode 68 - Face Eating<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5xm5fYa52bq3xPWtwxaQq05nod-wlMWIhS0659ROsCgBWcnaCSRWmX9gqNGR83bU98jAF_P-AnGVUa9mZNK6FAWUX9MPEiitTe0RXjzwUMLv2tA2tdgpwTcJwimDJq5e7JcotxHLpFj6n/s1600/zombie-eating-face.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5xm5fYa52bq3xPWtwxaQq05nod-wlMWIhS0659ROsCgBWcnaCSRWmX9gqNGR83bU98jAF_P-AnGVUa9mZNK6FAWUX9MPEiitTe0RXjzwUMLv2tA2tdgpwTcJwimDJq5e7JcotxHLpFj6n/s1600/zombie-eating-face.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Carwyn joins us again in another episode jam-packed full of nonsense.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This week we discuss a Queen's pardon for Gary McKinnon, the Daily Mail agrees with Steven, coffee mug-ger, Rebekah Brookes is hot, the Leveson Inquiry, misogyny loses baseball, stoning victim in logic fail, stupid kid's names, more government u-turns, Welsh nationalism, bath salt face eating and a watery threat to the Olympic torch.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant68.mp3">Download it now!</a></div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-26170707157646070722012-05-31T09:58:00.001+01:002012-05-31T13:09:28.808+01:00ASA Begins Investigation into IAIM Claims<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It may not be as salacious as some other <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/01/nun-priest-kiss-ad">announced investigations</a>, but I can now confirm that the <a href="http://www.asa.org.uk/">ASA</a> are investigating the <a href="http://iaim.org.uk/">IAIM UK Chapter</a> for potential breach of advertising codes in relation to the truth / substantiation of claims. For those people who have missed my previous posts about the communication of my complaint to the IAIM you may want to go and read them <a href="http://thinkrant.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/keeping-baby-massage-honest.html">here </a>and <a href="http://thinkrant.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/follow-up-keeping-baby-massage-honest.html">here</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Although the IAIM agreed that I had made a valid complaint, they chose to fob me off with the promise of a "review", not acknowledging the seriousness of unsubstantiated and potentially misleading claims on their website. After receiving no further reply I referred the complaint to the ASA. Yesterday I received confirmation that the complaint has been handed over to the investigations team. I won't post the email as ot was just a simple confirmation of further investigation from Lewis Jones (Complaints Executive).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If the ASA uphold the complaint then I will be referring as many breaches as possible from massage instructors' websites, in accordance with the ASA's compliance procedure. A message needs to be sent to organisations and individuals who offer these types of services: just because you have years of experience and anecdote about happy babies and mothers it does not give you license to make exaggerated, unfounded or misleading claims about health benefits.</div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-36631364458527929882012-05-24T13:01:00.000+01:002012-05-31T13:08:43.777+01:00Episode 67 - Carwyn Davies<div style="text-align: justify;">
This week we welcome Carwyn Davies as guest co-host, filling in for a busy Trevor. We discuss Obama coming out to support gay marriage, Diagio PR corruption gaffe, Prince Charles presents the weather, Matthew Wright has OFCOM woes, drugged dolphins, libel reform, austerity in Europe, british trains, Kuwait's new blasphemy law and John's ASA complaint.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Download it <a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant67.mp3">here</a>.</div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-59229928619623683732012-05-08T22:18:00.000+01:002012-05-09T10:47:08.473+01:00Episode 66 - Newport Takes A kicking<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhL4se17VufdIFlYRUzGZ_dkcKIQsLKVH-ONUlNbJ7lJQ9LGibq0-UPgMY9WcmrdZYlR8S5KNFOw1AnmZ4sGSgcDMt1GIhMLvqAXs_6Syh9iQTTSNxzUFSmTvIy5oPSBFcfAIGXLQ6e8RJr/s1600/inbred.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhL4se17VufdIFlYRUzGZ_dkcKIQsLKVH-ONUlNbJ7lJQ9LGibq0-UPgMY9WcmrdZYlR8S5KNFOw1AnmZ4sGSgcDMt1GIhMLvqAXs_6Syh9iQTTSNxzUFSmTvIy5oPSBFcfAIGXLQ6e8RJr/s1600/inbred.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Steven returns from his self-imposed exile to abuse the third best known city in Wales. This week we talk about Abu Qatada, anti-EU sentiment in the media, Alan Davies & Liverpool, Norwich City's "intellectual" property, excommunicated bishops, s127 of the Communications Act and African cake.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant66.mp3">Download it now!</a>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-29317741366753247782012-04-24T12:30:00.000+01:002012-04-24T12:40:12.720+01:00Follow-up: Keeping Baby Massage HonestGood news! I got a reply from the president of the IAIM, Ms Anita Bates. After reading her reply and googling her a bit I arrived at the conclusion that she's a genuinely nice person who wants to help. Here's her reply:<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Dear Mr Stabler,<br />Firstly, can I apologise that you did not receive a response from your initial email to us. We have checked and cannot find a record of it, so there was obviously a glitch at our end.<br />Thank you for taking an interest in the work of the International Association of Infant Massage (IAIM), and for blogging about how using infant massage strengthened the bond between your wife and your baby son.<br />I note you mentioned that the instructor who had run the baby massage course your wife attended had made some ‘very interesting claims’ about the benefits of massage, which were also included in the literature your wife received.<br />It would really help us to know if the instructor was IAIM trained as, if she did make misleading claims, then of course we need to know and to take action. We would also like to see a copy of the literature you refer to, to help us in our investigations.<br />The IAIM’s founder, Vimala McClure, began developing what is now the IAIM’s infant massage programme, which combines centuries-old Indian and Swedish massage traditions with principles from yoga and reflexology, in the 1970s.<br />Tens of thousands of parents and healthcare professionals around the world have since been trained to use the techniques, and happily endorse the positive physical and emotional benefits that the techniques can bring to both babies and parents/carers.<br />However, we do take your questioning of the evidence behind some of the very positive benefits outlined on the IAIM website very seriously.<br />I would like to assure you that the IAIM UK Chapter is currently undertaking a complete review of the information on the website. In fact, over the last few years the board has been piloting ways of gathering feedback from parents, carers and health professionals, so our claims can be clearly be backed up by evidence and demonstrated in real time.<br />Please do not hesitate to get back to me – especially if you can identify the baby massage instructor and the printed materials you refer to.<br />Kind regards<br />Anita Bates<br />President, IAIM UK Chapter</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
Considering the content of her response I wondered why it took so long to get back to me, but I guess I can appreciate people are busy. At least I got a reply!<br />
<br />
I won't pick her response apart; I'll just post my reply:<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
Ms Bates,<br />
Thank you very much for your reply. I can understand your problems with my first email; I work in IT and I know first-hand how overzealous some spam filters can be.<br />
Unfortunately, my wife's attendance at a baby massage course was quite a while ago now so we do not have any of the literature and memory of who the instructor was has long-since faded. I mentioned it in my previous email only to provide background and the reason for my attention to your website. My primary focus has been the claims made on the IAIM websuite because of the potential for IAIM members to use it as a source of information for their own websites etc.<br />
It doesn't surprise me that tens of thousands of people attest to positive experiences with baby massage and my wife may be one of them. However, this doesn't really address the problem of a lack of objective scientific evidence for what are specific claims of health benefits.<br />
I'd like highlight a very recent example which I believe demonstrates the problem with the current trend of using testimony and anecdote to justify objective claims. Recently the ASA concluded that the claims made by a faith-healing group were misleading (<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-16871116" style="color: #1155cc;" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-<wbr></wbr>england-somerset-16871116</a>). While I accept that the claims made for infant massage are not as extreme as those by the HOTS group, the analogy is very close. I am sure tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of people would attest to positive health outcomes through the use of faith healing or prayer. However, whenever controlled studies are performed on the efficacy of faith-healing or intercessory prayer it is discovered that it does not work in any practical sense. Therefore a higher standard of evidence is required to make such claims.<br />
I'm glad that you acknowledge the importance of questioning the evidence underpinning claims of benefits. I am, however, looking for actions that demonstrate the IAIM is dedicated to an honest and evidence-based approach in their communications. Although I have no reason to doubt that the IAIM is currently reviewing the contents of its website may I just reiterate the fact that I am not simply seeking some kind of personal satisfaction; I am looking to establish whether the website material breaches very important regulation that exists to protect the public (<a href="http://www.cap.org.uk/The-Codes/CAP-Code/CAP-Code-Item.aspx?q=CAP%20Code%20new_Specific%20Category%20Sections_12%20Medicines,%20medical%20devices,%20health-related%20products%20and%20beauty%20products_Rules#c581" style="color: #1155cc;" target="_blank">http://www.cap.org.uk/The-<wbr></wbr>Codes/CAP-Code/CAP-Code-Item.<wbr></wbr>aspx?q=CAP%20Code%20new_<wbr></wbr>Specific%20Category%<wbr></wbr>20Sections_12%20Medicines,%<wbr></wbr>20medical%20devices,%20health-<wbr></wbr>related%20products%20and%<wbr></wbr>20beauty%20products_Rules#c581</a><wbr></wbr>), something the IAIM should be looking to address urgently.<br />
Therefore I'd appreciate it if you could answer some further questions:<br />
1. How long will the review of your website take?<br />
2. Will the completion of the review result in the removal of unsubstantiated claims?<br />
3. Will the completion of the review result in the citing of scientific evidence to back up any objective claims made?<br />
4. What does the IAIM's efforts to gather feedback from parents, carers and health professionals have to do with providing objective evidence to back up claims made?<br />
If the answer to the first question is a period of time longer than the resolution procedures of the Advertising Standards Authority then I may as well just complete their online complaints form and add to their workload. However, I'd much rather see an internal resolution. I'm also keen to see the claims made on IAIM members' websites substantiated. On, what I assume, is your own website, for example, I found dubious claims such as "strengthens baby's immune system" and "helps to balance baby's respiration" (<a href="http://www.babybitsandbobs.com/page2.htm" style="color: #1155cc;" target="_blank">http://www.babybitsandbobs.<wbr></wbr>com/page2.htm</a>).<br />
Health workers and professionals play a very important role in society, but they must be careful not to step outside the boundaries of fact and into the world of fiction when making objective claims for their treatments and interventions. Using assumptions, intuition and anecdote instead of science leads to the slippery slope of misleading and potentially harmful claims.<br />
Kind Regards,<br />
John Stabler</blockquote>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-19337671972895408992012-04-10T22:51:00.001+01:002012-04-10T22:56:08.737+01:00Episode 65 - Self-Imposed Exile<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyuElS9ppMwRqfB-wC-O5QSPcd45Qe-RT4-4Cih0ttipyZ-Bal0to3TZfiUviyW5JeME2q59FMRpbxHgLJijHjaLRDdGaTXbtPRWBB_ELQTVUZ_Ge_6sA9z-o2asZuU9S8lHXjAGb_MB0P/s1600/age-of-consent-laws.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="256" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyuElS9ppMwRqfB-wC-O5QSPcd45Qe-RT4-4Cih0ttipyZ-Bal0to3TZfiUviyW5JeME2q59FMRpbxHgLJijHjaLRDdGaTXbtPRWBB_ELQTVUZ_Ge_6sA9z-o2asZuU9S8lHXjAGb_MB0P/s320/age-of-consent-laws.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Hopefully this is this episode represents the last week of Steven's exile from the podcast. But John and Trevor put in an extra special effort to bring you some of the more unusual news from the last couple of weeks, including Kony 2012, catholic USB porn, video game nasties, illegal homeless, Rowan Williams resignation, Christian Voice, gay marriage, age of consent and the start of our illiberal government.<br />
<br />
It's not all depressing, so don't be too worried about <a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant65.mp3">downloading it now!</a>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-1251472219010406782012-04-10T22:39:00.001+01:002012-04-10T22:53:54.061+01:00Episode 64 - Save Kony!<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggeMGgc89tcVFkVLGrrFjkirRmKMawD6XgHdy7zFM4de5DXIpT46A3IZk2Xa_2XD1xEZ7kMK5Wx8OPeY2DBPVEmz8P4qiVyXSkZaMBaxijirnd2g1lxPzO5eUPxJcYxqixvTN4-N7f3drN/s1600/kony.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggeMGgc89tcVFkVLGrrFjkirRmKMawD6XgHdy7zFM4de5DXIpT46A3IZk2Xa_2XD1xEZ7kMK5Wx8OPeY2DBPVEmz8P4qiVyXSkZaMBaxijirnd2g1lxPzO5eUPxJcYxqixvTN4-N7f3drN/s1600/kony.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
The title for this week's episode is a joke that we couldn't finish, even though Trevor put his comedy mind to it for quite a while.<br />
<br />
Anyway, please<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant64.mp3"> enjoy the usual comedy gold</a> from an episode that was almost lost due to laziness and incompetence.<br />
<br />
Lots of love, John, Trev and Steve xJohn Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-62001226700263878942012-04-10T06:00:00.000+01:002012-04-10T12:08:48.751+01:00Keeping Baby Massage Honest<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Back in November 2010 my son, Evan was born. My wife was very proactive and was always looking to do whatever she could to improve his well-being and development. Water Babies was an obvious choice of activity because we were keen on getting him used to water and able to swim as soon as possible (for family holidays abroad etc). My wife also chose baby massage as an activity for them in the first few months. She enjoyed attending the sessions and felt that they were of value because Evan enjoyed massage and she felt it strengthened the bond between them.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, she mentioned in passing some very interesting claims of benefits that were being touted by the massage instructor and associated literature. Now, being a skeptic, I could help myself and had to go and check on some of the more dubious ones such as that massage boosts the immune system and aids digestion. I also found these claims being made on the <a href="http://iaim.org.uk/benefits-of-baby-massage.htm">International Association of Infant Massge (UK Chapter) website</a>.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I found no such support for these claims in any scientific studies and so felt that it was up to me to bring it to the attention of the IAIM that they may be in breach of ASA advertising codes. I was also open to the possibility that I was wrong and simply hadn't looked hard enough so I suggested that they cite the evidence on their website. This was around the time when many in the skeptic community were scrubbing UK web pages of woo and homeopathy.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I didn't hear back from them directly, however I did notice that the specific claims of benefits to immune and digestive systems had been removed and some wording changed. Recently I revistited their web site to take another look at the claims and investigate some of the other ones a little more. Included was a claimed benefit to infant development which was not only unsupported, but had also been concluded to be not true by a <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17054233">Cochrane review</a>.</div>
<br />
Here's the email I sent to the IAIM (UK Chapter):<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
From: Johnathan Stabler [mailto:john.stabler@gmail.com]<br />
Sent: 05 April 2012 16:17<br />
To: info@iaim.org.uk<br />
Subject: Massage Benefit Claims on IAIM Website<br />
<br />
Sir/Madam,<br />
I sent you an email on 25/072011 pointing out that some of the claimed benefits of infant massage on your website were not supported by clinical evidence. I have noticed that the claim of "boosts immune system" has now been removed and "helps digestion" has been changed to "stimulation of...digestion...systems". While I am still concerned about your use of the word "stimulation" and the implication of benefits, I'd like to draw your attention to another statement on your website at http://www.iaim.org.uk/what_benefits.htm that claims "helping with language development, memory and concentration". I took the liberty of, once again, checking medical publication websites for trials/studies related to infant massage and this specific claim and once again drew a blank. In fact, a Cochrane systematic review concluded that there was no evidence of effects on cognitive and behavioural outcomes.<br />
If there is evidence for the efficacy of infant massage in such matters then I suggest you update your website and literature to cite such studies. If there are none then you are likely to be in breach of ASA advertising codes. Currently it would seem that the Wikipedia article on Infant Massage is better able to substantiate claims and cite sources than your organisation.<br />
In my previous email I also sought assurances that massage instructors were not making unsubstantiated claims of benefits. However, I was disappointed that my email was not even acknowledged, let alone information provided on how your members were being educated about the importance of evidence-based practise.<br />
Kind Regards,<br />
John Stabler</blockquote>
<br />
And here is the reply:<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Dear Jonathan<br />
Many thanks for writing to the IAIM. Your enquiry has been referred to our committee board who will reply back to you shortly. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any other queries in the meantime.<br />
<br />
Kind regards<br />
<br />
Nina Allen<br />
<br />
Administration Assistant<br />
International Association of Infant Massage (UK) Chapter<br />
Suite 10, 96 George Lane<br />
South Woodford<br />
London<br />
E18 1AD<br />
Tel : 020 8989 9597<br />
Registered Company : 6832002</blockquote>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Some people may ask me why I bothered? It's a helpful activity that provides mother and baby with many emotional benefits and there is nothing to suggest it causes any harm. However, baby massage courses cost money and are sources of income for the massage instructors. Also, the promotional literature tells parents that the course is of value and provides benefits that they wouldn't get otherwise. It could even be (indirectly) construed that you'd be denying youself and child something if you didn't do it. I believe all claims should be substantiated, no matter the potential for harm or the amount of money being made.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I will keep you up to date!</div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com14tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-77680037987547850032012-03-10T10:51:00.002+00:002012-03-10T10:56:52.023+00:00NHS reform...<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The NHS is need of change.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">There is no doubt to this fact and I am sure this would gain cross party support in the House of Commons. There is seemingly unmanageable bureaucracy at all levels, the mistakes Dr’s, nurses et al (they are only human) make are increasingly in the spot light, partly due to our increasingly prevalent “compensation culture”, we have the so called “post code lottery” and waiting lists seem to be ever increasing. Money is sluiced away.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The NHS is in need of a shake up, of this there is no doubt.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">But I still love the NHS. It’s like a favourite old aunt, loveable, caring, always there to put her arms around you, but with a bad hip and ever so slightly incontinent. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">I, like many people in this country have relied upon the NHS. It has arguably saved my life, it has certainly saved the lives of my mother, father and brother. Up and down the country people say the same thing. It is the greatest invention of the last century, inspired and led from the welsh valleys, through Nye Bevan and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tredegar_Medical_Aid_Society"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px; color:#3100b0;">Tredegar Medical Aid Society</span></a>. It’s founding principle was clear: A health service available to all, funded by taxation. People contributing according to their means. This model should still work today, sure we are living longer (down to improved Health Care), but our monetary wealth has increased also.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Lansley’s bill seems hell bent on destroying the NHS. Reformed to the point of destruction, deliberately broken beyond repair to pave the way for full privatisation. The bill has been rumbling around Parliament for a couple of weeks now and the sheer volume of amendments show just what a bad bill this actually is. Trumpeted as a cost saving and reforming exercise by the Government, the Health Secretary himself has admitted that it will cost £1.4bn to implement, with the National Audit Office warning of short term costs rising significantly coupled with decreased patient care. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The real elephant in the room, is of course the back door privatisation of the NHS. I have 2 issues with this. Firstly, I don’t believe that Competition is a good thing I don’t want a bargain basement service, where costs are cut to be increasingly “competitive”. I want a service that will work and give me the best possible care. If a private company can make a profit out of the NHS, why can’t the Government make a profit to reinvest rather that sit in shareholders pockets? Although, this bill does not fully introduce “privatisation” it is ultimately the end game. If in doubt please read <a href="http://www.allysonpollock.co.uk/administrator/components/com_article/attach/2012-03-08/BMJ_2012_Pollock_HealthSocialCareBill.pdf"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px; color:#3100b0;">this article published in the BMJ</span></a> (courtesy of <a href="http://bengoldacre.posterous.com/what-will-the-nhsbill-do-i-dont-think-youre-w"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px; color:#3100b0;">Dr Ben Goldacre</span></a>). </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Secondly, privatisation of the NHS will mean that health care provision will be available only for those who can afford it. According to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/nov/23/pay-gap-rich-poor-widens"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px; color:#3100b0;">Official Reports</span></a> the gap between rich and poor in this country is ever increasing (a problem affecting both this and the previous Governments). The current inflation rate and low wages further exacerbates this problem, adding the cost of health insurance to the monthly bill of a low income family will push people further into poverty. A lot has been said about the American model of health care, so I’m not going to cover it here in detail, but I would urge you to watch Michael Moore’s film “Sicko”. Although, I’m not a huge fan of Moore this film alone provides justification for a National Health Service.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The Lib Dem’s have an opportunity this weekend to deliver a knock out blow to this legislation. It is their party conference and there are 2 motions re: the NHS bill. One by Dame Shirley Williams to encourage support of the Bill, the other calls for the Lib Dems to scrap it. They have the power to defeat this bill, Labour will oppose the bill en masse meaning the Tories need the Lib Dems to pass this bill, if there is a revolt by the party we will see the end of this bill. I urge the Lib Dem conference to support the second motion, to listen to the views of the Health Professionals - The Royal College of GP’s, the Royal College of Physicians, the Royal College of Nursing, the Faculty of Public Health - they all believe that patient care will suffer at the hands of this bill. One of the thing we have heard the Health Minister talk about is “empowering doctors” and “handing power back”, well how about taking that on board and listening to them as they shout at him, “we do not want this Bill.”</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial; min-height: 12.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span><br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 11.0px Arial"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The NHS needs reform, this Bill will destroy it, and we will be left with a flash Aunt, conspicuous by her absence gallivanting around the world without time for us, maybe receiving the odd email. I don’t want that. I to be cwtched by my old aunt with her shiny, new hip replacement and to come away slightly damp.</span></p>Stevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02653272630922656037noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-57780067685604891782012-03-07T16:27:00.000+00:002012-03-07T16:27:29.438+00:00Episode 63 - Cameron Cancer<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0v44FcKiVRRfTDuerfjVnvqVW7GFwcu3IdGvDGuNaMUlcHourwNPW07r4_5f0NTcbxYM9rFVo6PdxUHj-fKTJRR-bcfRZW7F4ZGZR-0HysiDmH00CPWPY4emOzkPrBU0T71x752r4KLEh/s1600/cameron.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0v44FcKiVRRfTDuerfjVnvqVW7GFwcu3IdGvDGuNaMUlcHourwNPW07r4_5f0NTcbxYM9rFVo6PdxUHj-fKTJRR-bcfRZW7F4ZGZR-0HysiDmH00CPWPY4emOzkPrBU0T71x752r4KLEh/s1600/cameron.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
This week Trevor and John discuss the Anglican church's anti-gay marriage bigotry, bias and fractal irony in the US media, the workfare scheme and the scandal-hit management company, female reproductive rights and cherry-picking evidence, bat-shit crazy Republicans, praise for Gove and the usual features.<br />
<br />
IMPORTANT NOTE: We do not really believe there is a causal link between David Cameron and cancer. However, there may be a correlation, so we just thought we'd put it out there.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant63.mp3">Download it now!</a>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-28960511466867729712012-02-15T21:42:00.000+00:002012-02-15T21:42:00.644+00:00Episode 62 - Men Love Porn<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhRn1wfidZIGOuj21nKzaz6VcfvtAvqWycpEFuyjSsgb8-waJwbkbaMOGAhh3m3pvILTOLnpZs3tQjvE-lAW_Ln7ntoDDp0KyD19k3tGIuKYZC-F3bw-zP9ty6Ypj2pKE1D6xSTzOm-PaU/s1600/men+love+porn.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhRn1wfidZIGOuj21nKzaz6VcfvtAvqWycpEFuyjSsgb8-waJwbkbaMOGAhh3m3pvILTOLnpZs3tQjvE-lAW_Ln7ntoDDp0KyD19k3tGIuKYZC-F3bw-zP9ty6Ypj2pKE1D6xSTzOm-PaU/s1600/men+love+porn.png" /></a></div>
<br />
Returning to our usual schedule, this week we talk about fairness in football and the media, Julian Baggini discovers the obvious, men love porn, Leveson enquiry, privacy and freedom of the press, card-carrying catholics, Anglican bishop irony, citizen justice, twitter joke trial, PM's question time and the usual feature.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant62.mp3">Download it now!</a>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-49870939228396946652012-02-08T21:27:00.001+00:002012-02-08T21:27:28.046+00:00Episode 61 - Long Overdue<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhK1hytEW10DGymuwseTltlU6Qu_u0XiWJ38KUYsr58FGT8nKBzEhm5QXRKCjDhA2G_GCkMBpS9poqWEOBCHbtpJecHIrK6-4V8Z_n3Pqxp4KvX5BX53sWc4_awqHcFT4C6_RN4r7BpyaH7/s1600/overdue.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhK1hytEW10DGymuwseTltlU6Qu_u0XiWJ38KUYsr58FGT8nKBzEhm5QXRKCjDhA2G_GCkMBpS9poqWEOBCHbtpJecHIrK6-4V8Z_n3Pqxp4KvX5BX53sWc4_awqHcFT4C6_RN4r7BpyaH7/s1600/overdue.jpg" /></a></div>
Here it is. Sorry it has taken so long. There have been issues with the first two recordings after Christmas and I've been very busy in work and also ill, so this one is well overdue.<br />
<br />
Hopefully it'll be up to the usual high standards and we'll be back to our regular schedule now.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant61.mp3">Download it now!</a>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-23234007128712226302011-12-21T22:38:00.001+00:002011-12-21T23:52:20.767+00:00Episode 58 - Christmas Special 2011<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLuLVZOf-pphtfgbf2oV6xRrOX9JUVmf7Bq8uq9E3xTFoGj3DvbUzGWJvoMi2f41OEmGiw23m94S8GPuULAD0QpY7lNKJWxlG8eV55GLWXYZxp56zVUKNTP4S5-Vclnx_pdC2f-o-ECnP0/s1600/evil-santa.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="252" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLuLVZOf-pphtfgbf2oV6xRrOX9JUVmf7Bq8uq9E3xTFoGj3DvbUzGWJvoMi2f41OEmGiw23m94S8GPuULAD0QpY7lNKJWxlG8eV55GLWXYZxp56zVUKNTP4S5-Vclnx_pdC2f-o-ECnP0/s320/evil-santa.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
This week we discuss abortion and mental health, executing sorceresses, right to die in the media, microwaved kitten, Welsh top-level domains, local community broadcasting, predictions for 2012, lads culture at News of The World, Rhys Morgan gets into the Guardian, Julian Baggini's reasonable religion, and bad science (diabetes).<br />
<br />
<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant58.mp3" target="_blank">Go and download it now!</a>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-81418757205645000152011-12-13T21:44:00.000+00:002011-12-13T21:48:24.698+00:00Episode 57 - One Bad Apple<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUzt6PTcD-5MlFnpYl3R59PnI_KR5pAxxMCsxEZLqekfa6vCUF5-uX6HpAKin0Jh3BcibJIkt_Snzz9VvABVBD7p_bI7XrRbZGHLBQIbUDzu3O1Jzi1U7xYaBROwhsq71pfbCfJAeCKygq/s1600/bad+apple.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUzt6PTcD-5MlFnpYl3R59PnI_KR5pAxxMCsxEZLqekfa6vCUF5-uX6HpAKin0Jh3BcibJIkt_Snzz9VvABVBD7p_bI7XrRbZGHLBQIbUDzu3O1Jzi1U7xYaBROwhsq71pfbCfJAeCKygq/s1600/bad+apple.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Steven is off enjoying German culture (and beer), leaving John and Trevor in the lurch. We manage to fill the hour talking about bad Apple, nuns On pills, no carrots for muslim women, best Christmas films, poor cancer reporting, gay marriage ban, right to die and skeptic tone trolls.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Go ahead, <a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant57.mp3">download it</a>, I dare you!</div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-10033387663803513332011-12-05T22:09:00.001+00:002011-12-06T07:41:32.877+00:00Episode 56 - Burzynski Fail 2<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsK7yVCBMqQ71EJ_dn_mvuZflHxsaXyyap7Fz_1TY-iKdFZACG9T-q8vMmbeoacliHF8TdjRGe44IQ2r7yVgWnATAf_9ZAz7nR2uvFl1ib3fTS2lnR2kor7_9IY-fL-XYEJtmlnr-gGH57/s1600/burzynski.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsK7yVCBMqQ71EJ_dn_mvuZflHxsaXyyap7Fz_1TY-iKdFZACG9T-q8vMmbeoacliHF8TdjRGe44IQ2r7yVgWnATAf_9ZAz7nR2uvFl1ib3fTS2lnR2kor7_9IY-fL-XYEJtmlnr-gGH57/s1600/burzynski.jpg" /></a></div>
We talk a bit more about the Burzynski clinic and it's ridiculous libel threats, The Iron Lady, Jeremy Clarkson's idiotic comments, prostitute surprise, David Cameron's idiotic comments, tube train ranting woman, Julian Baggini's definition of "respectable" religion.<br />
<br />
You can go and download it <a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant56.mp3">here</a>.John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-64074065944409775032011-11-29T22:44:00.001+00:002011-11-29T23:04:22.807+00:00Episode 55 - Burzynski Fail<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrcWrLK_73YTG-NZBUqydBmyEJ7G9ubyEs553FWM5chwoQvnuM8lzcpZVci4QOMUod2OfTUXVS0SqrMSmQapXt9kacnRX8G7iyq_mmfjQ0Ql_M-iUybXEr0WLkWlr-fFn-KyP_TEFoiF-r/s1600/burzynski.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrcWrLK_73YTG-NZBUqydBmyEJ7G9ubyEs553FWM5chwoQvnuM8lzcpZVci4QOMUod2OfTUXVS0SqrMSmQapXt9kacnRX8G7iyq_mmfjQ0Ql_M-iUybXEr0WLkWlr-fFn-KyP_TEFoiF-r/s1600/burzynski.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We're back after another week off to bring you possibly the best episode ever! We discuss the Burzynski Clinic and celebrity endorsement, the role of the media in misinforming the public, Chris Huhne's ridiculous green tax energy policy and squeeze in our usual features.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant55.mp3">Download it now</a>.</div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-13452055569327202912011-11-14T21:39:00.001+00:002011-11-14T21:55:04.027+00:00Episode 54 - Spot The Libelous Omission<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi858RGIYAeWwsAeP9Hqv_0RPrHtEq8NNwi_XyWxofesI_5ttwBDe7Ep7ZaTZ8wiPPrM3zkyVRlBQ5GWs-jXfPVGGXDCrAxwvU1Gp1ASSSgdUV_ebvma1bptkM9_2BwFNywPRG_F4i0aC7k/s1600/theresa+may.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi858RGIYAeWwsAeP9Hqv_0RPrHtEq8NNwi_XyWxofesI_5ttwBDe7Ep7ZaTZ8wiPPrM3zkyVRlBQ5GWs-jXfPVGGXDCrAxwvU1Gp1ASSSgdUV_ebvma1bptkM9_2BwFNywPRG_F4i0aC7k/s1600/theresa+may.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Another week and another episode that sees us beating up on an idiotic Tory MP; this week Teresa May is under fire. We also discuss pox lollipops, White House denying existence of aliens, Peter Hitchens and Occupy LSX (St Pauls), Winterval not replacing Christmas, Daily Express gets maths wrong (shock!), Catholic compensation, and poppy burning of course.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Rejoice and go <a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant54.mp3">download it now!</a></div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4972016399196310707.post-17635181293719073672011-11-07T12:58:00.002+00:002011-11-07T13:18:06.769+00:00Episode 53 - Pirate Monkeys!<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzbTzWKR4zhdaFsxKCEU2V7U87wk-6QJRr3EHK3P5Cd0Iq-ZH7iTbPdqdS6bCyMOGn0rF7hivKUj0NBUMEthgYyQtlUtdTssKWcIbIxGxLGVdcl4kd8JpvYIKwH60xSExKCsQL6W9l5haH/s1600/Pirate+monkey.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzbTzWKR4zhdaFsxKCEU2V7U87wk-6QJRr3EHK3P5Cd0Iq-ZH7iTbPdqdS6bCyMOGn0rF7hivKUj0NBUMEthgYyQtlUtdTssKWcIbIxGxLGVdcl4kd8JpvYIKwH60xSExKCsQL6W9l5haH/s320/Pirate+monkey.jpg" width="248" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This week's episode is another cracker! We discuss the Charlie Hebdo petrol bombing, Mars mission simulation, Richard Littlejohn's duck rant, the end of the English language, spiritual health on the NHS, religious and scientific explanations, our opinion of The Matrix, Greek bailout referendum, Liz Jones, churches and civil partnerships and Derren Brown's The Gameshow.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/goog_247403087"><br /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://stabler.tv/ThinkRant/thinkrant53.mp3">Download it for free, now!</a></div>John Stablerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040887129341211890noreply@blogger.com0